Adjoint Representation

What’s adjoint representation?

We also call such group abelian, meaning Tg and gT commute, and if it doesn’t transform in such a way, it’s non-abelian.

It’s hard to understand the Einstein symbols in this representation formula, let’s use a concrete example to illustrate:

This leads to deep understanding that

Group typeWhat happens
Abelian (U(1))(gTg^{-1}=T) → no self-interaction
Non-abelian (SU(2), SU(3))(gTg^{-1}\neq T) → bosons carry charge

The aforementioned description remains convoluted; it is imperative that we focus on the fundamental aspects.

Starting from the definition of representation.

What exactly is the map ρ\rho when we say ‘adjoint representation’?

Key NOTE here:

Only in abelian case, the transformation of T returns T itself

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.